Australia's second moon - Ursu's 911! 8.5.11

This image from weeklyworldnews.com is presented as an evidence that there is a second moon in the sky

Now, I took the to the moon to right in the image above, rotated it -80°, stretched it somewhat and made it grey-scale. Apart from my result not being stretched exactly the right way, what makes my manipulated image below different from the one to the left above?

So my point is : since I could so easily create one of the moons above from the other, isn't it extremely likely that the "acctual" image is manipulated in the exact same way?
And if you download the original image and look at the Exif-information you see this :

So the photo is taken Aug 26 2010 and edited in Photoshop. Case closed.

Update Aug 6 2011:
This is apparently a recurring post as it was published in Aug 2010 in the Frank Lake Report along with news that Fidel Castro hopped a raft to America, Michelle Obama being pregnant in Jan 2011 (she should be due about now then) and lets not forget about Tuna Boy...

The blue moon

In previous videos Ursu's been seeing blue planets behind or next to the moon.
The image below, taken from a photography forum discussing problems with lens reflections, was taken by a guy (Ben_B) who also explains how he created it.

 

This image is linked from http://www.dvxuser.com/V6/showthread.php?189158-Strange-Lens-Flare









In many of his videos, especially the one where he uses a camera with lower resolution, you can clearly see the features of the-man-in-the-moon/the-rabbit-in-the-moon.
In one video (the one with the silent homeless guy) the blue thing can't even be seen until the angle between the camera and binoculars is adjusted.